During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
These benchmarks measure throughput in controlled scenarios — real-world performance depends on your specific use case. The difference between Node.js and browser gains reflects the distinct optimization paths each environment takes for Web streams.
。关于这个话题，爱思助手下载最新版本提供了深入分析
version: "1.0.0"
2．报送周期：每 24 小时报送一次。
。旺商聊官方下载是该领域的重要参考
Thanks for signing up!，详情可参考heLLoword翻译官方下载
International business